|
In celebration of the 50th anniversary of the legal incorporation of the
Claremont McKenna College Alumni Association, thirteen former
presidents of the Association gathered for a dinner and roundtable
discussion to share stories about their history and mission. The event was
hosted by Dan Baker ’65, and moderated by Kate Shuster, director of
debate outreach. Parts of the lively, thoughtful discussion are excerpted
here. The entire conversation is archived online at
http://www.claremontmckenna.edu/news/cmcmagazine/2005fall/.
MODERATOR How, in your opinion, does the
Alumni Association benefit the College,
and how has the Association maintained
itself as a vibrant organization?
HAMLIN: In my day, we really didn’t have
an association. We had a Los Angeles
chapter, and the College sponsored dinners
three times a year. We were just a
small, fraternal group, but we knew we
had something good going—and
President Benson was a marvelous leader.
We got involved, and the friendships
developed. I and my vice president, Bob
Olshausen [’51], agreed to write a constitution.
Then, fortunately, Gene Wolver
came along and legalized it all. Today’s
Alumni Association is such a unique body
because of Gene. He made us a
California corporation.
WOLVER: Thornton failed to mention one
thing: when I was alumni president, he was the alumni secretary for the
College—my aide de camp, without
whom I really would not have had any
modicum of success as a president.
I think the alumni are a family of very
passionate people. You’ll find that
among alumni, there is a passion for the
institution that rivals or exceeds anything
I know—a real sense of dedication.
The alumni organization, as an
incorporated body, was to serve alumni,
serve the College, and serve the cause of
education thereby. We wanted to have
ways and means of getting to know each
other and continuing our relationships
with the institution. Today, the single
biggest source of funds for the institution
comes from alumni. The alumni
constitute over three quarters of the
Board of Trustees. We support the institution
and each other, put on programs,
and create scholarships. I think we’ve made a significant contribution to our
school, and we’ll continue to do so.
HEESEMAN: I think another area where
the Alumni Association was very helpful
was setting up Reunion, which has led
to a tradition that, every five years, a
fair number of people from each class
come back to the College. Coming
back is a very good way for people to
renew their connection with their classmates
and their tie to the College.
CUTTING: I think that a couple of words
stand out: independent and proud. My
class, and the classes four years ahead of
me and four years behind me, had a
fiercely loyal, proud feeling for our college.
It was vibrant, with the high
expectations of a young school. We
knew we were in a place that allowed us
to be a fraternity, and yet standards of
excellence also were there. And, somehow,
that created a fellowship. Every
one of us at this table is fiercely proud
of Claremont for its excellence and
high standards.
MODERATOR What about the College
holds alumni together after graduation?
SMITH: It’s the Athenaeum and the food
there! Actually, I believe volunteering
for a well-run organization, with bright
people who are enthusiastic about a
certain cause, works well under the
CMC banner. That kind of environment
creates a collective situation for
an individual to grow and learn as well
as benefit the College.
DAVIDSON: I think what’s unique about
CMC is we have a mission that brings
people who are interested in economics
and government to the school. That
common interest keeps our alumni
together. And as the students have
become more diverse, the Alumni Association similarly has become more
diverse. I think that’s very positive, and
keeps the bond that we begin in school
and maintain as alumni.
BAINS: We’re looking to make sure that
everyone is a part of the Alumni
Association, if they just reach out. We
don’t charge anything; it’s free! I think
that’s the biggest part of it—reaching
out to new graduates.
MGRUBLIAN: I really think it starts with
the way we admit students. We admit
students to CMC because we believe
that, at some point in their life, they’re
going to be leaders: leaders in business,
government, or the professions, or
leaders in their communities. So, I
think, it’s no surprise that people who
are interested in being leaders also are
interested in being part of organizations
where they can have an impact. In the
Alumni Association, you can have an
impact on the College. This
Association, in large part, is the voice of
the alumni on policy issues that come
up at the College—and the College listens
very carefully. So, I think, when
you’re an alumnus looking to get
involved, you say: Here’s a group that
the College respects so much that they
allow four members to sit on the Board
of Trustees. That’s more than just planning
parties; that’s having an impact on
one of the finest institutions of higher
education in the country. That’s pretty
heady stuff.
MODERATOR What have been some of
the biggest changes in the Alumni
Association and at the College?
GRANTHAM: We were, at the outset, a very
small group, which all started, really,
from the L.A. chapter. We’ve since
become an international organization
and undertaken a series of programs remarkable in their contribution to the
Association and to the College.
HEESEMAN: The biggest change, in my
mind, is how the reputation of CMC
has grown. I think that jump has made
a big difference in how people and,
quite frankly, alumni look at CMC. It’s
much easier to feel very positive about
your school when it has that kind of
reputation.
BAKER: I was part of the Alumni
Association, and an alumnus trustee,
during some interesting times—when
the College decided to admit women. I
also was involved in the changing of
the name. I think that the opening of
the campus to women and the changing
of the name made a huge difference
in the quality and the character of
the alumni.
GRANTHAM: We were very concerned
about changing our school. I also think
that Mabs [Mrs. George] Benson put
her finger on it when she said: “The
alumni really aren’t concerned about
admitting women. they don’t want to
lose the name.”
HEESEMAN: They didn’t want to lose their
identity.
BAKER: Fortunately, McKenna showed up.
HEESEMAN: I think everyone at this table
will agree, in hindsight, that changing
the name made a lot of sense. It was
the right thing for the College to do. I
was president of the Alumni
Association the year the name was
changed. There was a vortex of different
views on that issue.
MCHALEY: The alumni body, I believe,
supported changing from a men’s college
to a coeducational college.
WOLVER: To the credit of the College,
the alumni were very much involved, as
was pointed out by David.
MGRUBLIAN: Rex was president of the
Alumni Association and I was student
body president at the time of the name
change. I remember, distinctly, President
Stark [ Jack Stark ’57] coming to
ASCMC and asking us to vote on how
we viewed the name change. I think
that’s an example of solid governance,
and how the College always has been
about building consensus. Because the
College and the Board always have been
interested in building consensus, they’ve
empowered students and they’ve
empowered the Alumni Association, and
it’s benefited both.
BAINS: Another major change the
College has gone through is communication.
The Internet has allowed us to
reach out more to alumni. We send
newsletters and reach out internationally
via e-mail, and I believe that adds to
the College’s prestige.
LONG: I think that one of the major
changes has been the fund drive [Alumni
Fund]. Whether we like it or not, money
does talk, and it is very, very important
because we have a lot of students getting
scholarships from the Alumni
Association. This is very important, I
think, to our alumni group, who feel
connected to the College, and that they
really are doing something for young
people who are very talented and of very
good integrity. I’ve always felt like that’s
one of the greatest things about CMC—the acceptance you receive from the
alumni family.
MODERATOR How do you keep track of
alumni all over the world, organize
them, and maintain their interest in the
College?
MCHALEY: Up through the ’40s and the
’50s, we were still very small, and everybody
knew everybody. It’s that camaraderie,
built when we were small, that
kept that the Alumni Association strong.
I think another thing that affected it was
George [Benson]’s influence in the initial
stages. George stood out there and
said, “By God, we’re going to support
them and make it happen.”
GRANTHAM: He dedicated staff to the
organization from the beginning, and
that made it possible to communicate
and have meetings.
CUTTING: There are about 7,300 people
involved, in 19 local alumni chapters. I
think one of the big challenges, going
forward, is to network. L.A.’s always
going to be a big chapter, and San
Francisco is always going to be a big
chapter—but how do we reach the
Chicagoans and the New Yorkers? I
think this is a challenge for not only the
Alumni Association but those of us who
do outreach. As we’re traveling, we’ve
got time to stop off in New York, or
Chicago, or Denver, and go to these
meetings and fly the local flag.
HEESEMAN: I think an important point
was made a minute ago: CMC itself
supported the effort, having staff people
that made a huge effort to get things
going. And, let’s face it—to a large
extent, how local chapters do is a function
of how much support the school
gives, because volunteers are volunteers.
They have a day job, so to speak.
SMITH: There’s another factor that plays
into the connectivity of CMC: our
Phone Night, where alumni gather
together and call friends across the
country. It’s kind of old-fashioned, and
it’s a lot of work, but I think it’s been
critical. We compete quite well, thank you, against our peer institutions, and I
think a lot of that has to do with the
esprit de corps of the individuals who
are part of the Alumni Association.
DAVIDSON: We target alumni at various
phases of life, and design programs that
meet their needs. And, as everyone has
said, because we’re so small, we can
identify each and every one. We have a
lot of benefits, and offer all kinds of
opportunities for alumni. And I think,
yes, we get a lot of staff support, but it’s
the volunteers out there who are the
army of people who make it happen,
and that’s a very special thing.
BAINS: Another important piece is our
strategic plan, which we go back to, year
after year. We’re looking at all of these
issues that have been discussed, and deciding
in which ways we can best address
them—and as a family, we do that.
BAKER: When we decided to have this
dinner, I wanted to see what we were
trying to accomplish. I asked for copies
of the Alumni Association’s goals and
strategic plan. I read them, and I said:
These people are really good! Are we
benchmarking against anybody?
DAVIDSON: We’re currently engaged, at
the request of the Board of Trustees, in
a best practices survey: identifying
schools throughout the country, seeing
what they do, and comparing it to what
we do. And, while we haven’t concluded
the process, I think we have discovered
that CMC is right at the top in many
areas. We do really well with very limited
resources. We could do phenomenally
well with a few more resources!
CUTTING: We have a good relationship
with the College. At a lot of colleges
the Alumni Association is seen but not
heard. I don’t know if your survey found that, but I think there’s a lot closer
relationship with the administration.
HEESEMAN: I think that gap is closing. As
a couple of people have pointed out,
over the years, I think, the leadership of
CMC has been very willing to listen to
the alumni. On the other hand, I would
say, based on my limited experience,
other universities and colleges are getting
more into this area, so the idea
that we are unique is not quite as dramatic
now as it was a few years ago. I
think, in this area, schools are becoming
much more sophisticated in how
they deal with their alumni. They’re
kind of catching up to us.
WOLVER: We led the way, Rex.
HEESEMAN: Yes, I think in many respects
we did, Gene. And, you know, the lesson
might be: How do we keep leading the
way?
MODERATOR The Alumni Association has
a strategic plan, a network, and an
unbelievable array of offerings. There
are many brilliant and talented students
now at the College—the future members
of the Alumni Association. What is
your advice for the next generation?
HAMLIN: Keep it up!
WOLVER: Classes in literature, philosophy,
history, and the humanities have
stood the test of time for me. I would
advocate that students concentrate on a
broad, general education, getting the
benefit of the truly talented minds on
the faculty. And, also, get to know the
Alumni Association and be involved.
MCHALEY: Have a good time at the same
time that you’re getting a good education;
do your best at both the educational
part as well as the fun part.
CUTTING: I’m not qualified to give
advice! I would say, take advantage
of what the College has to
offer. Enjoy, and don’t lose
sight of the fun.
HEESEMAN: Consider the
dramatic changes that
have happened in the
world in the last 13 years:
what’s going to be the
change in the next 13
years? That’s the challenge
for everybody in
this room. But even more
so for people who are in
college right now.
MGRUBLIAN: I made my closest and dearest
friends in college. Cherish building
those relationships.
BAINS: I would say the word “indulge”
comes to mind. CMC is a wonderful
place; you have to go in, and dig deep,
and savor it.
DAVIDSON: I’ve realized what I do, and
what I’ve done with most of my life, is
attributable to what I learned at CMC.
My way of saying “thank you” to the
College is by participating in the
Alumni Association.
SMITH: You can call it luck, you can call
it fortune, but it is precious to have an
opportunity to attend CMC. Going
there leaves you with an obligation or
an opportunity—and that is to be a
pathfinder for others to follow.
WOODS: Don’t worry about what you
learn. Learn how to learn. All the
information I picked up at CMC is
now out of date. What isn’t out of date,
I forgot! In my own life, I’ve had to reinvent
myself four, five, six times, and
each time, I could look back to my experience at CMC. I picked up the
skills to see that my life was changing
and different demands were being
placed on me, and I was nimble
enough to adjust to that and, sometimes,
take advantage of it.
BAKER: I would strongly suggest to students
that they be involved in the
Alumni Association, because you’ll get
more out of it than you put in.
LONG: I would recommend that all of the
students there work very hard at learning
how to express oneself in written
form, and also in speech. Leaders are
communicators, leaders are speakers,
leaders are writers.
GRANTHAM: Enjoy yourself, in a broad
social sense, as well as doing your best
in your classes.
MODERATOR Well, I’d like to thank
everybody for coming. It’s been a pleasure
to moderate this discussion, and I
hope to see you at the 75th anniversary!
Back to Table of Contents
|
|
From left, CMCAA past presidents Thornton Hamlin Jr. '50, Lorraine Bains '88, Dan Baker '65, William Woods II '77, Robert E. Long '52, Richard Grantham '50, Eugene Wolver Jr. '51, David Mgrublian '82, Lloyd McHaley '59, Phillip Cutting '58, and Darrell G. Smith '74. Inset: Cary Davidson '75 and Rex Heeseman '64.
ATTENDEES
Richard Grantham '50 GP'99 (1952-53)
Thornton Hamlin Jr. '50 (1953-55)
Eugene Wolver Jr. '51 (1959-60)
Lloyd McHaley '59 (1965-66)
Robert E. Long '52 (1969-70)
Phillip Cutting '58 (1976-77)
Dan Baker '65 (1977-78)
Rex Heeseman '64 P'95 (1981-82)
William Woods II '77 (1989-90)
Darrell G. Smith '74 P'00 (1994-95)
David Mgrublian '82 (1995-96)
Cary Davidson '75 (1997-98)
Lorraine Bains '88 (2002-03)
|
|
Fine Print
|
|
From:
CMC magazine
Fall 2005
Feedback:
E-mail the office of
Public Affairs & Communications about this article:
publicaffairs@claremontmckenna.edu
The Author:
Kate Shuster, director of debate outreach for The Claremont Colleges Debate Union
Photo credits:
Alissa Sandford
|
|